Marriage Between Deaf and Hearing Persons
Deaf-hearing marriages have their own special challenges. The best analogies from outside the Deaf world are:
We have seen two kinds of deaf-hearing mixed marriages:
There is a couple of a Deaf man and CODA woman who works as Sign Language interpreter. They have a policy whereby the wife does not interpret for her husband. They say that she is his wife rather than his interpreter.
On the other hand, there is a couple of a very successful oral deaf man and hearing woman. The man says that he'd not marry a deaf woman. According to him, an hearing woman adds a very useful capability which facilitates several aspects of life. This is analogous to marrying someone with an occupation with high earnings potential.
(Contributed by Robert Rourke at 3 Oct 1995.)
As a matter of fact, I did not even think about the additional dimension of deaf/hearing relationships at all before my current 6-year relationship with a hearing lover, even long before my first two previous relationships with hearing people. Their (hearing's) personalities, ablities to understand, willingnesses, patiences, charmings, intellectuals and/or others are the more compelling reasons for me than their ability to help me in daily life.
(Contributed by Susan A. Pollack at 10 Oct 1995. She is a deaf woman married to an hearing man.)
On occasion, I have him make a phone call or do something inanely "hearing" for me, but that's not why I married him. The fact that he can hear doesn't add any real useful aspect to my marriage (and I'm not putting him down -- he knows this) because I'm an independent person and married him for the person he IS, not for his ears. I don't like to take advantage of the fact that he CAN hear because when I'm in a situation where he's not there to fill me in on what's going on, I can get even more lost because I'm not paying close enough attention to the situation or the people around me; I may end up expecting someone else to fill me in when they don't even know that they should.
The best thing my husband can do for me is tell me what someone said on TV when the captions are garbled or when they're not there at all. But that's not always a big deal either because I read the newspaper and talk about TV programs the next day with my coworkers.
If a person suggests that deaf people should marry someone who's hearing only because the hearing spouse can help out the deaf spouse all the time, he/she implies that the deaf person will (or even should) become dependent on the hearing person. What kind of life is that? I personally don't ever want to reach the stage where I have to ask my husband to be my interpreter everywhere I go -- what would I do if he left me? In some cases, it's good to depend on and get help from your spouse. But in the big scheme of things, it's better to depend on yourself.
Alexander Graham Bell advocated legislation to prohibit deaf persons from marrying each other (and require compulsory sterilization of deaf girls). The reason was to prevent hereditary deafness from passing to new generations, forming a deaf human race. Such a legislation would have required every deaf person to marry an hearing person, or else live "in sin" or live alone.
The opposing point of view is that deaf-deaf marriage is just like hearing-hearing marriage. It will be obviously difficult on the surface but only on the surface. In a deaf-deaf marriage, the deaf spouses, despite their broken ears, can feel like hearing people, without domination by the better-hearing side. It is also more likely for a deaf person to identify with and love another deaf person, because of the communication and similarity of their backgrounds. And of course, the deaf-deaf couple can overcome obstacles and it is more fun doing it together than alone.
Last update date:
2007 Dec 28
Did this Web site help you?
If yes, you may want to consider making a donation to me.
When making a donation, please tell me what additional information could I add to the Web site, to make it even more helpful for you and people like you.